![]() |
Exegesis Volume 07 Issue #073
In This Issue: From: "Atlantis Ecological Community"
|
Exegesis Digest Tue, 03 Sep 2002 |
From: "Atlantis Ecological Community"
Subject: [e] Re: exegesis Digest V7 #72 Apropos of the horary question from Ann
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 17:03:28 -0500
I forgot to put in the date of the question: Sept1 2002 5.36 am Popay n, Colombia. Oops! Anne Barr
> >exegesis Digest Tue, 03 Sep 2002 Volume: 07 Issue: 072
> >
> >In This Issue:
> >#1: From: "Atlantis Ecological Community"
> >Subject: [e] Horary doubts and Questions
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >From: "Atlantis Ecological Community"
> >Subject: [e] Horary doubts and Questions
> >Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:15:16 -0500
> >
> >
> >Dear Moderator,
> >
> >I don't know if this fits the kind of thing you put out but here goes
anyway.
> >
> >I'd like to put forward for group discussion - if anyone is interested -
the question of whether damn horaries damn well work or damn well don't! I
have had both experiences and feel quite frustrated.
> >
> >In a way, folks, I am looking for therapy as I did a chart for 2 friends
about to enter Palestine from Jordan. It looked wonderful. But they were
refused entry.
> >
> >The time was 5.36 a.m. Popay n, Colombia (76w36 X 2n27)
> >
> >The Moon was about to trine Venus, wonderful, I thought. (Cancer was on
the cupst of the 11th house, ruling a question asked about friends)
> >
> >Does that Mars, one degree off a conjunction with the Ascendant and ruling
the 8th, give a negative answer?
> >
> >While I'm at it, I have a few other questions about horary. I am learning
purely from books, Lilly and one by a Dutch lady called Karen Hamaker. I
used to have one by Derek Appleby as well (got stolen) and have used the
excellent guidelines set out by Maurice McCann too.
> >
> >I suppose several 1000 people besides myself have noticed that Lilly is
inconsistent and sometimes uses derived houses for Questions asked about a
3rd party and sometimes doesn t bother.
> >
> >I've started to disregard his "first 3 degrees is too early and last 3
degrees is too late" rule. And have found that one can interpret charts
with success that break his rules. But...this one that I just failed on,
had a rising degree at 2 degrees Virgo...
> >
> >I have chosen to study horary as deeply as I can as it seems to be a
fairly limited of field of study where one can actually test all the rules
with concrete questions.
> >
> >I also consider the aspects to the outer planets valid and use the 'new'
rulerships too and find it all works.
> >
> >Anyones opinions for or against or about any of this would interest me
greatly. And any recommendations for sites/articles on horary I'd also
really appreciate.
> >
> >From Anne Barr
> >Colombia
> >South America
> >
> >A big PS. Although some of the more technical technicals escape me I have
learnt a lot from your site and love the premise from which so many people
are working . i.e. does it work and if it does why? Thanks for all the
work you must put into it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------
> >
> >End of exegesis Digest V7 #72
> >*****************************
> >|| http://exegesis.dyndns.org/exegesis/exegesis.html
> >|| Moderator: exegesis-owner
> >|| To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe exegesis'
> >|| as subject to lists
> >
End of exegesis Digest V7 #73
[Exegesis Top][Table of Contents][Prior Issue][Next Issue]
Unless otherwise indicated, articles and submissions above are copyright © 1996-2003 their respective authors.